Outlook does a lot of saving to the primary disk. Would this be bad for an ssd?
Outlook does a lot of saving to the primary disk. Would this be bad for an ssd?
No more destructive to an SSD than an HDD.
]From other forum:
]"Outlook: http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/20...24/450881.aspx
]
]Outlook 2003 Speedups:
]
]Biggest gain comes from cutting .pst / .ost file to below 1gb
]
]Recommended is 600mb - that takes archiving.
]
]Repair the .pst / .ost with scanpst tool:
]
]http://office.microsoft.com/en-ca/ou...563001033.aspx
]
]Dump any add-ins that are not needed - validate each one in terms of effect on performance.
]
]Then:
]
]Dump IM, mapped drives that are not needed, and speech /handwriting recognition.
]
]http://www.slipstick.com/problems/slow.htm
]
]Note: none of these moves require moving files to Ramdrive or other high risk moves.
]
]I run the .pst off a SD card in the Netbook.
]
]It will occasionally slow down (ie if you open junk mail folder) but generally it is fast enough to trade off portable .pst folder between my 2 computers.
]
](I keep master copy on the bigger machine, and copy the .pst to the SD card for the netbook for travel. In effect, an automatic backup).
]
]You'll have to "request" them yourself from these pages:
]http://support.microsoft.com/kb/961752/
]http://support.microsoft.com/kb/967688/
](click on the links "View and request hotfix downloads")
]There you'll get to enter you email and you'll get personal download-links to password protected zip-files (are they getting paranoid at MS or what?)"
^^^^ Made no sense to me.